Star Wars on Trial:Charge #4

By October 16th, 2015
Charge Four

Science Fiction Filmmaking Has Been Reduced by Star Wars to Poorly Written Special Effects Extravaganzas

For the Prosecution: John G. Hemry
For the Defense: Bruce Bethke

John G. Hemry‘s thoughts on Star Wars’ impact on filmmaking can be easily summed up by the title of his essay, “Millions for Special Effects, Not One Cent for Writers.” In particular, Hemry attacks the prequel trilogy, alleging that through all the “wooden acting and clichéd dialogue” the only thing that holds the audience’s interest is special effects.

Bruce Bethke counters that after Star Wars was released in 1977 “science fiction experienced a great renaissance” and the genre finally received the recognition it deserved. Bethke also commends Lucas for reintroducing the hero, following a period of cinema in which “scripts were full of cynical, violent and foulmouthed antiheros.”

Now it’s your turn—discuss this charge in the comments below by drawing from your own Star Wars expertise and utilizing new evidence from The Force Awakens. And be sure to always be respectful of your fellow Star Wars fans!

What is your judgment on Charge #4?

View Results

Click here to move on to Charge #5 and click here to go back to the main Star Wars on Trial voting page

Leave a Comment to Ben


No Comments On "Star Wars on Trial:Charge #4"

  1. Ben

    What a silly charge. It implies that Star Wars has had a massive influence on Sci Fi films, and then in a bad way by concentrating on SFX budgets. I would argue that for every film influenced by Star Wars there are four films influenced by Bladerunner. Whole sub genres influenced largely by Bladerunner. Star Wars is an ‘also ran’ here.


Stay Updated

on our daily essay, giveaways, and other special deals

Our Books

Subscribe via RSS