Since 1990, Michael Marano has been reviewing movies and doing pop culture commentary for the Public Radio Satellite System program “Movie Magazine International,” syndicated in more than 111 markets in the U.S. and Canada. In this capacity, he has seen and ranted on and pontificated about perhaps more than 1,000 genre movies, and is now unfit for most any other form of employment. His articles have appeared in venues like the Boston Phoenix, the Weekly Dig, the Independent Weekly, Paste Magazine and Science Fiction Universe. Marano is also a horror writer, with stories in The Mammoth Book of Best New Horror 11 and Outsiders: 22 All-New Stories from the Edge; his first novel, Dawn Song, won the Bram Stoker and International Horror Guild Awards. He is a bitter old punk rocker, and can be reached at www.myspace.com/michaelmarano.
On Firefly/Serenity
River Tam and the Weaponized Women of the Whedonverse
By Michael Marano
3 Comments
Joss Whedon shares a lot in common with the Greek god Hephaestus—and I don’t mean that he’s a hairy, ugly dude conceived by his mom through parthenogenesis in a fit of jealous pique and thrown off Olympus with such force that he fell for nine days.1 Hephaestus was the armorer of the gods. He made Zeus’s thunderbolts and scepter, Athena’s shields, Eros’s arrows, Achilles’s armor, and Helios’s chariot. But there’s a certain blurring of Hephaestus’s specialization, if you rummage through The Iliad. In Book Eighteen, Hephaestus is shown not only as a manufacturer of weapons, but of women, having created two artificial maidens made of gold as his workshop help who are as smart and skilled as any living girl.
I bring this up because the idea of a woman as created by a weapon-maker within Patriarchal contexts is a recurring motif in the worlds imagined by Joss Whedon, the so-called “Whedonverse.”2 It’s a motif, perhaps better defined as “the woman as weapon,” that reaches its apotheosis with the developmental journey of River in Firefly and Serenity. I say it reaches its apotheosis, because as I write this, she’s the most recent example of this trend; there could be more in Whedon’s future work that are more apotheosis-y. But for now, let’s take a look at River’s creation and development as a weapon—as the creation of weapon-makers—by first taking a look at a few of her antecedents. The motif of the woman-as-weapon is a fairly complicated one, with a number …
Other Essays by Michael Marano
- Inner Demons, Outer Heroes, Outer Villains
from Webslinger - Ra's al Ghul: Father Figure as Terrorist
from Batman Unauthorized - Theater of Faces
from Farscape Forever - Dalton's Gang
from James Bond in the 21st Century
About Michael Marano
3 Comments On "River Tam and the Weaponized Women of the Whedonverse"
Leave a Comment
Stay Updated
on our daily essay, giveaways, and other special deals
Latest Blog Posts
Smart Pop’s Comic Con recap (part one)
You may have noticed the Smart Pop blog fell a little quiet last week, and that’s because the Smart Pop... Read More »
Posted July 27th | 2 Comments »True Blood “I Got a Right to Sing the Blues” (3.6) Recap
And, the latest episode of True Blood is also being recapped today, as well, by Nick Mamatas.
***
In my... Read More »
Posted July 27th | 2 Comments »True Blood “Trouble” (3.5) Recap
This recap (from last week’s episode) is from Paula Rogers, who we got to know better... Read More »
Posted July 27th | No Comments »





Follow us on Twitter
Become a fan on Facebook
Subscribe to our essays
at 9:34 pm
Odd that Echo isn’t mentioned here, since her story is really the culmination of this woman as weapon pattern you point out here.
Echo’s innate abilities have been subverted by the Patriarchy in some of the most abominable ways, her ultimate creation as a weapon was done at the hands of a man, and it’s the evil corporation’s “patriarch” who forced her into the situation in the first place.
at 3:03 pm
Unfortunately, the essay was written– and the book was published– before Dollhouse began. I think it’s pretty impressive, given that, how Echo fits so well into what Mike’s saying here!
at 2:26 pm
Aeryl,
It’s like the writer hasn’t watched Dollhouse, a lot of Whedon fans have not, unfortunately.